Notice...

Please be advised: The WicBury Crapper and it’s staff take no responsibility for metering, publishing, filtering, or maintaining comments from our readers. Although we do our best screen most comments, some harassing, ignorant, or offensive comments may be posted by our readers.All comments are the sole responsibility of their respective commenters. By reading this blog you expressly consent to not being offended by the information contained herein and agree not to take legal action for any information contained herein against any member of the WicBury Crapper or it's staff or board. If this blog or any of it's content offends you, please leave now.

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

High expectations? States eye marijuana reform

Wash. mulls 15 percent tax as two dozen others consider legislation

OLYMPIA, Washington - Washington is one of four states where measures to legalize and regulate marijuana have been introduced, and about two dozen other states are considering bills ranging from medical marijuana to decriminalizing possession of small amounts of the herb.

"In terms of state legislatures, this is far and away the most active year that we've ever seen," said Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the New York-based Drug Policy Alliance, which supports reforming marijuana laws.

Nadelmann said that while legalization efforts are not likely to get much traction in state capitals anytime soon, the fact that there is such an increase of activity "is elevating the level of public discourse on this issue and legitimizing it."

"I would say that we are close to the tipping point," he said. "At this point they are still seen as symbolic bills to get the conversation going, but at least the conversation can be a serious one."

Opponents of relaxing marijuana laws aren't happy with any conversation on the topic, other than keeping the drug illegal.

"There's no upside to it in any manner other than for those people who want to smoke pot," said Travis Kuykendall, head of the West Texas High Intensity Drug-Trafficking Area office in El Paso, Texas. "There's nothing for society in it, there's nothing good for the country in it, there's nothing for the good of the economy in it."

Legalization bills were introduced in California and Massachusetts earlier this year, and this month, New Hampshire and Washington state prefiled bills in advance of their legislative sessions that begin in January. Marijuana is illegal under federal law, but guidelines have been loosened on federal prosecution of medical marijuana under the Obama administration.

Even so, marijuana reform legislation remains a tough sell in some places. In the South, for example, only Mississippi and North Carolina have decriminalization laws on the books.

"It's a social and cultural thing," said Bruce Mirken, spokesman for the Marijuana Policy Project, a Washington, D.C.-based marijuana advocacy group. "There are some parts of the country where social attitudes are just a little more cautious and conservative."

'Pros and cons'
Rep. Mary Lou Dickerson, a Seattle Democrat who is sponsoring the legalization bill in Washington state, said that she "wanted to start a strong conversation about the pros and cons of legalizing marijuana."

Under her bill, marijuana would be sold in Washington state's 160 state-run liquor stores, and customers, 21 and older, would pay a tax of 15 percent per gram. The measure would dedicate most of the money raised for substance abuse prevention and treatment, which is facing potential cuts in the state budget. Dickerson said the measure could eventually bring in as much to state coffers as alcohol does, more than $300 million a year.

"Our state is facing a huge financial deficit and deficits are projected for a few more years," Dickerson said, referring to the projected $2.6 billion hole lawmakers will need to fill next year. "We need to look at revenue and see what might be possible."


Allen St. Pierre, executive director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, said that tough economic times across the country have lawmakers looking at everything, and may lead even more states to eventually consider the potential tax value of pot.

"The bean counters are now reporting back to their elected officials how much money is being left off the table," he said, adding that billions of dollars worth of pot is going untaxed.

Ron Brooks, president of the National Narcotics Officers' Associations' Coalition, said that he feared that, if legalized, marijuana would contribute to more highway accidents and deaths, as well as a potential increase in health care costs for those who smoke it.

State lawmakers, he said, need to ask themselves "if they believe we really will make all that revenue, and even if we did, will it be worth the suffering, the loss of opportunities, the chronic illness or death that would occur?"

Legalization isn't the only measure lawmakers across the country are weighing. About two dozen states, including Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Wisconsin, are considering bills ranging from medical marijuana to decriminalizing possession of small amounts of marijuana, St. Pierre said. Washington state is among the states that are considering decriminalization, with a bill that would reclassify adult possession of marijuana from a crime with jail time to a civil infraction with a $100 penalty.

Voter-driven initiatives
Fourteen states, including Washington state, already have medical marijuana laws, and 13 have decriminalization laws on the books, St. Pierre said. About two dozen cities across the country, including Seattle, make marijuana offenses a low law-enforcement priority.

Marijuana advocates said that while increased activity in the statehouse is heartening, change most likely will come at the ballot box through voter-driven initiatives.

"Inevitably, the politicians are going to be behind the curve on this stuff," Nadelmann said, noting that almost all of the medical marijuana laws came about by initiative.

This month, a group campaigning to put a marijuana legalization measure before California voters said it had enough signatures to qualify for the 2010 ballot.

That proposal would legalize possession of up to one ounce of marijuana for adults 21 and older. Residents could cultivate marijuana gardens up to 25 square feet (2.3 sq. meters). City and county governments would determine whether to permit and tax marijuana sales within their boundaries. And in Nevada earlier this month, backers of a move to legalize marijuana there filed paperwork creating an advocacy group aimed at qualifying an initiative for the 2012 election.

Sheriff Lewis Wants Death Penalty


Sheriff Mike Lewis stated that he wants Thomas Leggs, Jr., accused murder of Sarah Foxwell, to face murder charges in the death of Sarah who's body was found on Christmas, 2009. We can't say we disagree. Leggs has not yet been charged with murder due to the on going investigation however murder charges are expected shortly.

=






Apparently this piece of shit is facing earlier burglary charges in stemming from an incident where a female met him in a bar and he stated that he couldn't go home because his roommates wouldn't let him in. She asked him to leave twice. He regained entry to her residence and later that night the female woke up to this piece of shit standing by her bed with his pants down.

Monday, December 28, 2009

Press Release from State's Att. Office, Salisbury

Thomas James Leggs, Jr. appeared before the Honorable L. Bruce Wade for a bond hearing and advice of rights hearing. The Defendant did not speak during the hearing.

The State, represented by the undersigned State's Attorney and supported by two Assistant State's Attorneys and Detectives from the Wicomico Bureau of Investigation, strongly requested that the Court order that Leggs be held without bond.

Judge Wade ordered that the Defendant be held without bond (cannot be released at all) at the Wicomico County Detention Center pending further legal action.

No further information is available at this time.

Saturday, December 26, 2009

A Community United... Special Thanks...

Over the past few days we have seen a community truly united for a cause of finding a missing and abducted child. Not only did thousands of volunteers arrive to assist for the search but thousands of people donated their time, food, water, and shelter to police officers, sheriff's and fire/ems workers from the entire area.

We wish to thank everyone involved that assisted which includes all police officers, road officers filling in, search teams, commanders, fire department, and volunteers who came from across the area to assist in this great effort. It is very unfortunate of the ultimate outcome however, there has never been a more dedicated effort witnessed by this writer by all involved and we and the entire community owe you a deep debt of gratitude.


Special thanks to the following people....who's dedication and efforts have not been overlooked... the following people are awarded the following from our staff and board and will be receiving an award from our staff:



Sheriff Mike Lewis
Acting Chief Ivan Barkley
S.A. Davis Ruark
MSP On Scene Leadership
Chief Gary Baker
Capt. Mike Elliott
Lt. Tod Richardson
Lt. Robin Roberts
First Sgt. Tim Robinson
Sgt. Marty Fisher

Fire Dept. Dive Units
MSP/DSP Flight Staff

Special Thanks....

  • Police Volunteers
  • Salisbury City Police Department
  • Citizen Volunteers
  • Citizen Supply Donors
  • Detectives, CID, FBI, and WBI Staff
  • Assistant State's Attorney's
  • Fire Dept. Volunteers
  • Patrol Support
  • Police and Sheriff Search Units
  • Search Party Volunteers

Excuse us if we have left anyone out. There were so many that lended a hand. We honor you.

About the Murder of Sarah Foxwell...

About our lack of reporting...

We did not report on any of the investigation or other surrounding the disappearance, search, and ultimate murder of Sarah Foxwell. This was not by mistake. With all the news outlets reporting news we felt it was counterproductive to report on the investigative efforts being undertaken by police, fire, and citizens at the time they were occurring. Additionally, all of us at this blogsite were involved in the search in one form or another and due to time being dedicated to the search efforts, none of us had time to man publishing the blog.

We understand that some may disagree with our decision however, we felt it was right not to report on the missing person investigation or the ultimate finding of Sarah out of respect to her family and the community at large. Furthering this blog with comments and/or opinions about the search efforts or anything else would have been unconscionable to us; with the express urgency being finding Sarah. The other media outlets had the need of water deliver and others covered as trucks of water showed up.

About Leggs...

Now that Sarah has been found we look forward to the conviction and hopefully the ultimate death sentence for Leggs. A monster that deserves a horrible, suffering death.


We extend our sorrow and empathy to the family and Friends of Sarah.

Foxwell's family establishes memorial fund

The family of the 11-year-old girl who was found dead by police on Christmas day, has established a memorial fund at a local bank, according to the family's pastor.

Donations to the Sarah Haley Foxwell memorial fund can be made at any Farmers Bank of Willards branch.

Foxwell was reported missing by family members on Dec. 23. After searching for three days, police located her body in a rural Delmar area.

Investigators charged Thomas James Leggs Jr. with Foxwell's disappearance a few hours after she was reported missing, according to police.

Farmer's Bank of Willards locations:

Main Office
7484 Market Street
Willards, Maryland 21874
(410) 835-8906

Willards Branch
7233 Main Street
Willards, Maryland 21874
(410) 835-2482

Shopper's World
Salibury Branch (Next to K-Mart)
365 Tilghman Road
Salisbury, Maryland 21804
(410) 742-1534

Pemberton
1150 Parsons Road
Salisbury, Maryland 21801
(410) 749-4027

Milford Street
102 Milford Street
Salisbury, Maryland 21804
(443) 260-4780

White Marlin Mall Location
12641 Ocean Gateway
Ocean City, Maryland 21842
(410) 213-2983

Montego Bay Shopping Center Location
12831 Coastal Highway
Ocean City, Maryland 21842
(410) 250-1512

E-mail Comments from Readers...

THank you for all your help ,My heart is broken ,I cant write more .No words can express my thanks to you all.

(Readers Names)
P.s. I know it sucks to have to keep him seqestered from other inmates.

--------------------

Crapper,

About the comment you made on posting info on this case; how about, "Water Needed at Perdue Stadium for the thousands who showed up to volunteer” that might have looked nice on your site, or putting her photo on every link and e-mail address you have. Maybe even something like this,
" Wicburycrapper Blog site donates food, water, and manpower for the search of Sarah Foxwell". That may be stretching it, or how about this headline, “Along with countless other media, Wicburrycrapper stayed to keep the story straight”. I know, I did see part of your “consortium” there and working hard to get the job done, but something on your site would have been greatly appreciated. I read and enjoy your articles and am gratified by the candor the site offers to all of us, but I have to admit I was disappointed by not even seeing a picture of Sarah on your site.

(Reader's Name)
Salisbury, MD
DFC, Wicomico County Sheriff’s Office

Friday, December 25, 2009

Why we don't print any articles about active investigations...

We have received numerous e-mails about why we don't print articles about on going police investigations, like the current missing persons investigation.

We feel printing anything about an on going investigation can be detrimental to the ultimate outcome of the investigation and therefore, we will never print any information regarding an on going investigation.

Other sites, we feel, hamper the police effort to solve crimes at times by printing misleading, false, inaccurate, or rumor information.

Thank you for your understanding,
The WicBury Crapper Team

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Video shows plainclothes D.C. detective drawing gun during snowball fight



WASHINGTON — Washington police were investigating on Sunday whether an off-duty officer drew his gun in the midst of a snowball fight involving a couple hundred people.

The Metropolitan Police Department said video from a local media outlet at the scene Saturday did not show the officer with his weapon drawn. However, authorities have since received "additional images and statements that would seem to support the allegation that the off-duty member did pull a gun," a police statement said.

About 200 people from a D.C. neighborhood had gathered Saturday to brave a snowstorm for a massive snowball fight, CNN affiliate WJLA reported.

"It was pretty fun," one unidentified participant told WJLA. "And then, you know, when the gun came out, uh, it just changed the tone of the thing a little bit."

The off-duty, plainclothes officer was driving in the area of the snowball fight when several snowballs hit his vehicle, police said. The officer exited the vehicle and yelled at the crowd, WJLA reported; witnesses accused that officer of drawing his gun.

A uniformed police officer who subsequently arrived was holding a gun at his hip, but he eventually returned it to his holster, video from WJLA shows. MPD Assistant Chief Peter Newsham said the uniformed officer was responding to a 911 call that someone -- apparently the plainclothes officer -- had a gun, according to WJLA.

The uniformed officer holstered his weapon when he recognized the plainclothes officer, Newsham said, according to WJLA.

The police statement said "there is no evidence that [officers] pointed any weapons in the direction of the crowd or at any individuals."

Calif. court overturns ban on felons owning body armor

By Robert Faturechi
Los Angeles Times

LOS ANGELES — A police advocacy group has criticized an appeals court judgment last week overturning a law that prevented violent felons from owning body armor, saying the ruling will put officers and the public in danger.

The decade-old ban was enacted after the 1997 North Hollywood shootout, a confrontation between police and two heavily armored bank robbers that injured officers and civilians. The state Legislature passed the ban in 1998 as a measure to protect police. Thursday's ruling by the 2nd District Court of Appeal in Los Angeles overturned the state law, saying it was unconstitutional because the definition of body armor was too vague.

"It just makes this job that much more dangerous," said Paul Weber, president of the Los Angeles Police Protective League union for LAPD officers.

"It's going to make criminals more bold and more likely to shoot it out with the police."

Drunk suspect gets in unmanned police cruiser, yaps on radio until arrested

By William Bender
The Philadelphia Daily News

GLENOLDEN, Pa. — George Arkins was practically asking to get arrested.

Over the police radio.

Inside a cop car.

Early yesterday morning, police were on foot investigating a small fire in Glenolden Park when they were jolted by an unknown voice on their radio.

Following a night of drinking at Dino's bar on MacDade Boulevard, Arkins, 44, was walking home when he decided to hop in an unmanned police cruiser and strike up a conversation on the radio, said Glenolden Police Chief Michael Donohue.

"Hello, hello, I'm inside a Glenolden police car with nobody around," Arkins said into the radio, according to the police report.

He proceeded to provide anyone who was listening with his name and address on Scott Avenue.

"This person, for whatever his reasons were, decided to get in the car and start yapping on the radio," Donohue said.

A police corporal and a radio dispatcher told Arkins to knock it off, "but the male voice continued talking over the police radio," the criminal complaint states.

When the officer returned to his car, sitting outside Glenolden Park, Arkins was waiting there with his hands up. Police found marijuana in his pocket, and a homemade pipe.

Arkins, who has a previous DUI conviction, was charged with drug and paraphernalia possession, disorderly conduct and public drunkenness.

"I don't know what he was thinking," Donohue said.

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Are a cop's personal cell phone records fair game in court?

When Officer John Boerth got to court on what he thought would be a slam-dunk DUI case, a surprise move by a public defender forced him and the prosecutor to draw a line in the sand.

Their second surprise came when the trial judge stepped over it.

Now, support of the judge’s action recently by the New Mexico Court of Appeals potentially raises a question for every officer in the country: to what extent are records from your personal cell phone subject to public review in a criminal trial if you carry the phone with you on duty?

“Hopefully, the appellate decision will not have significant impact in other states,” says PoliceOne columnist Ken Wallentine, a law professor and chief of law enforcement for the Utah Attorney General’s Office. “But it would be wrong to just shake your head and say this is not a big deal.

“This case speaks directly to the issue of privacy rights of police officers, and the appellate decision could have persuasive authority in other jurisdictions. Frankly, this case scares me.”

What Happened
One quiet, rainy summer evening in 2005, John Boerth, then a patrol officer and now a detective with the Santa Fe PD, responded as backup toward what sounded to him like an ambulance-assist call on the other side of town. A woman was reported down in the parking lot of a gas station/convenience store, and a civilian was said to be performing CPR on her.

En route with lights and siren activated, he got an update. “Now,” he told PoliceOne, “dispatch said she’d been loaded into a four-door gold or tan Honda that took off. I wondered why they got out of there before the ambulance arrived, but I figured maybe they were going to the hospital.” He killed his lights and siren and turned back toward his beat.

Moments later, a brown Acura sedan with a male driver and two female passengers turned in front of him. That could be the car from the parking lot, Boerth thought. Moreover, “the driver was not maintaining his lane...weaving, bouncing off the curb.”

The officer reactivated his emergency equipment and pulled the car over.

“There were Budweiser cans on the floor in back and the driver was nodding like he was on heroin,” a symptom Boerth readily recognized from past experience working narcotics. The name and DOB the suspect offered came back clean, but he failed a field sobriety test and, despite an initial consent, ultimately refused to have blood drawn at a nearby hospital.

When Boerth questioned the women, they admitted having been at the gas station. “Everyone in the car shot up,” Boerth says. One of the females seemed to OD, but when the others brought her around, they all left.

Boerth arrested the driver for DUI. It was not until the man was booked into the jail that Boerth discovered he’d lied about his name.

He was really Marty Ortiz, with several past DUI convictions (among other offenses), making him eligible for a felony charge — and forcing Boerth to redo the paperwork because of the name change. “It was all a big old mess,” Boerth recalls.

Ortiz was not an easy client for a lawyer to defend. Besides the previous driving offenses, his sheet included multiple drug convictions, burglary, attempted murder — a laundry list of crimes large and small. Donna Bevacqua-Young, Traffic Safety Resource Prosecutor who represented the State in his latest DUI, had “prosecuted him five or six times before,” she says. She believes the public defender who drew his case groped for a viable legal strategy.

It was in this effort that the case morphed from messy but commonplace into a hot potato that some legal observers say is potentially transformative.

During a series of pretrial hearings and conferences in Santa Fe County district court in the summer of 2006, the public defender doggedly pursued a bold demand for discovery. He wanted “access to evidence of all oral, electronic, telephonic, or written communications made between Officer Boerth and any other person” during the stop, “including personal cell phone calls that Officer Boerth had with anyone.”

As Boerth recalls it, there were allegations that “I knew his client and was out to get him.” Supposedly a “confidential informant” had called on the officer’s cell phone that night to tip off Ortiz’s whereabouts. Boerth’s dash-cam revealed no evidence of erratic driving, it was claimed, so the stop was made on a false “pretext” and therefore was illegal.

“Concocted BS!” Boerth emphatically asserts. “I’d never seen the driver before that night. If I knew him and was out to get him, why would I do all that paperwork with the phony name he gave me?”

As to the video recording, “The camera didn’t start until I turned on my emergency equipment to actually pull him over. I witnessed the dangerous driving behavior before that.” The public defender referred to that unrecorded gap as “missing footage,” implying a suspicious irregularity. It amounted to six minutes and 35 seconds between the time Boerth killed his lights and siren from the gas station run until he decided to stop the impaired driver.

Boerth says he did have a personal cell phone with him, but he didn’t receive or make any calls on it relative to the stop and arrest. And there was no confidential informant.

Ramifications for Officer Safety
Ken Wallentine, writing about the case later in his legal newsletter “Xiphos,” observed: “Ortiz’s defense attorney didn’t use the term ‘fishing expedition’ in the demand for [Boerth’s] cell phone records, but offered no substantive basis” for why he was entitled to get them. Nor was the formal process of subpoenaing the records and giving Boerth a chance to be heard followed.

Donna Bevacqua-Young, the prosecutor, says she didn’t know about Boerth’s personal cell phone use on the night in question — or even if he had one with him. But when the defender made his sweeping demand, she was alarmed. She told PoliceOne: “I thought about the security of officers’ friends and families. If dangerous felons can get their hands on private cell phone records, anything could happen.”

She argued — with the full support of Boerth and the police department — that granting the defense motion would constitute an unwarranted invasion of the officer’s privacy and violate his rights under the federal and state constitutions. He “has a reasonable expectation of privacy in his personal cell phone records,” she said.

At the very least, she maintained, the federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act specifies that “reasonable grounds” must be shown that the records are “relevant and material to an ongoing criminal investigation” before they can be ordered surrendered, and the defense had failed to offer such proof. She told the judge, “There is no way that the State is giving out” Boerth’s cell phone information which, for the record, remained in the officer’s possession.

Ortiz’s attorney kept pressing, of course, arguing that Boerth “did not have an expectation of privacy of his cell phone records while on duty, on patrol, in a marked unit, during an emergency or arrest situation.”

After weeks of wrangling, Judge Stephen Pfeffer in the end agreed that the defense “had a right to access the requested information even without knowing whether any such information existed.” He did attach limitations. Only Boerth’s cell phone records during the controversial six-minute “missing footage” gap in his dash-cam recording would be subject to review. This apparently was the time the defense considered most likely that the alleged C.I. call occurred. And the State could request that the judge first inspect the records alone in his chambers to determine if they included “personal matters irrelevant to the case.”

With those conditions, he ordered Bevacqua-Young to produce Boerth’s cell phone records. The officer was “an arm of the State,” the court ruled, and therefore his private phone records were “within the possession, custody, or control of the State, making them subject to disclosure.” Still, the prosecutor steadfastly refused to order Boerth to surrender them.

Her stance was “insulting” and “in bad faith,” Pfeffer declared, and it “arguably intentionally” prevented the trial from moving forward. Early in 2007, he granted a defense motion to dismiss the case. Marty Ortiz walked.

On the State’s appeal, the case landed with the New Mexico Court of Appeals, which now, nearly three years later, has issued a ruling that supports Judge Pfeffer’s decision and his reasoning regarding officers’ personal cell phones.

Bevacqua-Young’s behavior in refusing to cooperate was “conscious, intentional, and unjustifiable,” the Court of Appeals stated. Her privacy arguments were not “persuasive,” in the court’s view. For example, the court reasoned, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act protects only service providers, not phone customers. Consequently, “[W]e will not disturb the district court’s decision.” Ortiz’s dismissal and the judicial reasoning behind it stand affirmed.

Not surprisingly, Bevacqua-Young is convinced the appellate panel got it wrong. “I wouldn’t change anything I did,” she says. And Boerth predicts that “this is not going to be the last time this issue comes up.”

Wallentine agrees. He praises Bevacqua-Young for “cowboying up and standing her ground” regarding Boerth’s privacy rights. He believes that Pfeffer’s order for her to produce the phone records was a “plain violation” of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act.

“I am mightily offended by the outcome of this case,” he says. “I consider it a warning. It raises vital questions about an officer’s constitutional rights. There may be a lot of intimate information on a cell phone, in addition to numbers called and received: family records, photographs, internet banking transactions, passwords, account numbers. Is it right for an officer to have a diminished expectation of privacy regarding his personal life just because he carries a personal cell phone on duty?

“Right now this case affects officers in New Mexico. Maybe it will not gain traction in other jurisdictions. But you should be discussing the issues involved with your administration, your prosecutors, and your union so you know where you stand before you find yourself facing them.”

In New Mexico, appeals of court rulings are handled by the Attorney General’s office. Bevacqua-Young says the decision had been made there not to appeal the Ortiz case further.

Two Wash. sheriff's officers critically injured by gunman lying in wait

12/22/2009

The Associated Press

Washington State Patrol and Lakewood Police officers light flares at a roadblock near the scene of a shooting that involved two Pierce County Sheriff's deputies, Monday, Dec. 21, 2009, near Eatonville, Wash.

EATONVILLE, Wash. — Two sheriff's officers were wounded while responding to a dispute at a home between two brothers - the third shooting of law enforcement officers in Washington state in the last three months.

The officers killed the gunman before they were rushed to the hospital. One was listed in stable condition, the other was in critical condition in the intensive-care unit.

Sheriff's spokesman Ed Troyer said the sergeant and a deputy were shot at around 8:45 p.m. Monday while responding to an altercation between David E. Crable and his brother near Eatonville, a rural community in the Cascade foothills. The home is about 15 miles west of Mount Rainier National Park and 50 miles south of Seattle.

Crable, 35, shot the two officers before he was killed when they returned fire, Troyer said, adding that the gunman has a history of "terrorizing" his family. The names of the officers were not immediately released.

Troyer said the officers were met at the door by Crable's brother, Troyer said. When the deputies entered the house, Crable opened fire from upstairs, hitting one of the officers multiple times.

"This is somebody that was laying in wait for our guys," Troyer told reporters near the shooting scene. "There's not much we're going to be able to do when somebody is hiding and arming themselves and we have somebody else inviting us into the residence and the second person opens fire on us."

Crable's family tried to help the wounded officers by providing first aid, Troyer said. Deputies said the brother was cooperating with investigators and did not call him a suspect.

"It looks like people that were in this residence went out of their way to help our people," he said.

The shooting comes three weeks after four Lakewood police officers were shot and killed at a coffee shop before their shift. After a two-day manhunt, suspect Maurice Clemmons was shot to death by a Seattle police officer. The Thanksgiving weekend attack on the officers occurred about 17 miles northwest of Monday's shooting scene.

A month earlier, Seattle Officer Timothy Brenton was killed as he sat in his patrol car Halloween night. Christopher Monfort, 41, has been charged with aggravated first-degree murder in Brenton's death.

"Most people of the community as we have seen in the last few weeks have a tremendous regard for (law enforcement)," Pierce County Sheriff Paul Pastor said at the scene late Monday. "But there are people in the community that don't come from there, and that's the people we deal with day after day."

After Monday's shooting, the deputy was airlifted to Harborview Medical Center in Seattle, where spokeswoman Susan Gregg-Hanson said he was in critical condition in the intensive care unit.

The sergeant was taken to Madigan Army Medical Center and was in serious condition, Troyer said. Madigan spokeswoman Julie Calohan said he was in stable condition early Tuesday.

Monday, December 21, 2009

Ariz. inmates lose case, Sheriff Joe can play Christmas music all day in jail

12/21/2009

Washington Times

PHOENIX, Ariz. — Sheriff Joe Arpaio - the self-proclaimed "toughest sheriff" in America - likes Christmas music, especially "Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer" and anything by Alvin and the Chipmunks, and apparently he thinks the 8,000 inmates inside his Phoenix jail should, too.
So it was with some glee that his Maricopa County office announced Thursday in a red-and-green press release that the "sixth and perhaps final lawsuit" brought by inmates to stop the sheriff from playing the holiday songs all day, every day, during the holidays had been dismissed in federal court.

"We keep winning these lawsuits. Inmates should stop acting like the Grinch who stole Christmas and give up wasting the court's time with such frivolous assertions," it read. "But chances are they'll keep suing and we'll keep winning."

The latest lawsuit was filed by inmate William Lamb, who said that being forced to listen to the Christmas songs 12 hours a day was a violation of his civil and religious rights. But U.S. District Judge Roz Silver disagreed, dismissing the case and denying Lamb's claim for $250,000 in damages.

Sheriff Arpaio catapulted to national attention when he cracked down on the thousands of illegal immigrants who swarm daily through his county; put inmates in pink jumpsuits and underwear; worked them in chain gangs; housed them in tents in the Arizona desert and fed them bologna sandwiches.

He said that his Christmas selections were multi-ethnic and culturally diverse, from all faiths and ethnicities. He told The Washington Times earlier this year that in addition to tunes by Alvin and the Chipmunks, the music included the Mormon Tabernacle Choir, Bing Crosby and Doctor Demento.

At the time, he said "all people everywhere deserve a little Christmas cheer."
Lt. Brian Lee, the sheriff's spokesman, said the court issued a summary judgment upholding the decision to "inject the holiday spirit into the lives of those incarcerated over the holiday season in the third-largest jail system in the U.S."

He said inmates have sued six times claiming the music was in violation of their religious rights or cruel and unusual punishment, but the court disagreed - finding no evidence of fact, so Sheriff Arpaio was entitled to the judgment as a matter of law.

The sheriff is no stranger to controversy, although his philosophy of "zero tolerance towards the criminal element" has been embraced by his deputies and the community alike. He was first elected in 1996 and was re-elected by double-digit margins in 2000, 2004 and 2008. In 2007 a petition to recall him failed to gain enough voter signatures to get on the ballot.

Most recently he has come to the attention of the federal government. He was notified in March by the Justice Department that he may have unfairly targeted Hispanics and Spanish-speaking people for arrest. In October, the Department of Homeland Security revoked the authority of 160 of his federally trained deputies to make immigration arrests in the field.

The sheriff has denied any wrongdoing and has said he welcomed and would cooperate in any investigation of his office. He has continued to arrest illegal immigrants under recently passed state laws.

Tired of waiting for the federal government to secure the U.S.-Mexico border and concerned about the potential terrorism threat that the lack of border security posed, he assigned deputies in 2006 to monitor his 9,226-square-mile county for illegal immigrants. He targeted the illegals under an anti-smuggling law that state lawmakers passed to fight drug trafficking.

"My message is clear: If you come here and I catch you, you're going straight to jail," he said at the time. "We're going to arrest any illegal who violates this new law, and I'm not going to turn these people over to federal authorities so they can have a free ride back to Mexico. I'll give them a free ride to my jail."

Sheriff Arpaio, 77, captured headlines nationwide when he set up a jail system that included tents, spent less than 15 cents per meal per inmate, and banned smoking, coffee, movies, pornographic magazines and unrestricted television in all of his jails. He also assigned both men and women to chain gangs.

The sheriff also has created several rehabilitative programs, including "Hard Knocks High," the only accredited high school program administered by a sheriff's office in a U.S. jail.

More recently he has been mentioned as a possible candidate for governor, with polls showing that he has a commanding lead as a Republican candidate for the November 2010 race.

A November poll by Rasmussen Reports said that of 1,200 likely Arizona voters, he was the Republicans' "best shot at holding onto the Arizona governorship in 2010." The poll said Sheriff Arpaio led the expected Democratic challenger, Terry Goddard, Arizona's attorney general, by 12 points and that 64 percent of voters statewide said he was doing the right thing by working around federal law to continue his aggressive actions against illegal immigration.

Lt. Lee said his boss had received "multiple inquiries locally and nationally" about the latest Rasmussen poll, but had made no decision regarding the governor's race.

Sunday, December 20, 2009

Cops still don't have shotguns!

By WicBury Crapper Board Member "SilentButDeadly"....

Even after the last several weeks of a story we published to combat crime and the tools that were required, cops at most departments still don't have shotguns or rifles. Why is this?

We warned you. There will come a time when a law enforcement officer's life is taken by a criminal because he was out gunned. In law enforcement there is the old adage that cops should respond with one step greater force than encountered. But, this is not the case.

So, with armed robberies sure to continue into the new year and with the majority of all reported cases to be armed perps it's just a matter of time before some unlucky cop responds to an alarm he/she thinks is routine and gets shot and killed. Especially considering that many reports have come in that the suspect is armed with a shotgun. The people are pissed at the crime rate. Do you think because the Chief of Police leaving the crime rate is going to dramatically drop? Guess again.
Oh and hey, how about lets let all the cops carry shotguns and rifles, not just the favorites? Is their life more valuable because they are your personal administrative favorite? Not to that cops family which you'll be folding and handing over a flag to.
No shotguns/rifles for cops=less protection for cops & their families = death of a police officer = citizens less protected

General Counsel Returns With Opinions and Suggestions

General Counsel To Crapper returns this week to challenge the minds and ethics of those dedicated law enforcement officers who are committed to the protection of the people of the City of Salisbury and Wicomico County. The events of the past two weeks, including the retirement of the Chief of Police of the City of Salisbury, require that each and every City Police Officer, each and every Deputy Sheriff and each and every Maryland State Trooper to band together even closer to look out for one another, to work even more closely and to share more information in a timely fashion. There are no real jurisdictional lines in Wicomico County, many of us can't tell where the city ends and the county begins in certain areas on the fringes of Salisbury. All in this together.

The time's now here to explore the closer collaboration between all of the agencies, Delmar and Fruitland included. It's time for the City to fully re-enter WINTF: it's time for the Cities, County and State to join together in a Violent Crimes Task Force: it's time for consideration of bringing the City into the Wicomico Bureau of Investigation, with the understanding that the latter must move in a deliberate manner so as not to dilute the quality of investigations currently being produced.

It's also time to consider the merger, or a structure closely resembling a merger, of the the Salisbury Police Department and the Wicomico Sheriff's Office, bringing the strengths for each agency into line (e.g. LEOPS for the Sheriff's Office and salaries for the City Officers). It's time to review supervision structures for each and every agency.

The challenges are large, but the timing is right to start this process. Let's hope that politics can be put aside so that morale and pride of all of the law enforcement officers in Wicomico County improves. There is absolutely no reason why the Cities of Salsibury, Fruitland and Delmar, the Wicomico County Sheriff's Office and the Maryland State Police from Barrack "E" can't be the be the most professional and best crime fighting forces in the State of Maryland and on the entire East Coast.

There is some strong leadership and professionalism in place in certain strategic locations. Much of the community would support these or similar changes. All of the leaders in law enforcement, the State's Attorney, the Sheriff, the Acting Chief of Police of Salisbury, the Chiefs of the Fruitland and Delmar Police Departments, and the Superintendent of the Maryland State Police should come together to make positive and permanent changes to the "way we do business" down here.

There are legal issues to be considered and some of them are large. But they can be overcome. Counsel will address some of these in future postings.

The age of dysfunctionality is over. The age of excellence is on the verge of beginning.

Let's all pull it together now.

The comments are open. Feel free to challenge any of the rambling ideas here, and more importantly to suggest changes that might even more positively impact the quality and quantity of law enforcement for all who work in Wicomico County. Let's hear them.

Friday, December 18, 2009

Chief Webster Retires

After a long political battle both in the media and blogs, Chief Webster is retiring after spending 10 years as the city police chief.

Webster is pursuing medical retirement for a shoulder injury that he suffered sometime during the course of his career. Webster is also currently retired, and collecting retirement, from Baltimore where he spend a career as a police officer eventually rising to the level of a ranking officer, we believe a major, in internal affairs.

During his retirement, he will get 70% of his current salary paid to him as a police chief from the city due to LEOPS retirement if he retires on disability.

Although just weeks ago Webster traded quips with a reporter from WBOC stating that he will only leave when Allen Webster is ready. This seems to be a departure from his last attitude and may very well be due to the fact that the city offered him a medical retirement in order to leave, although that is pure speculation.

What are your thoughts on a possible replacement? What type of changes do you think would benefit the department and the citizens?

Results: Officer of the Month, November 2009

And, the winnnner is.... Det Bob Wilson of WCSO. Det. Wilson has shown his dedication to police work throughout his career and continues his dedicated work for WCSO in the division of WBI, Wicomico's version of CID. We congratulate Det. Wilson on his award. As always he will receive a certificate, a letter, and a gift card.

In second place, the SET team of SPD comes in winning with 8 votes. The CAT will receive a prize as well including a letter, a gift, and a certificate. Excellent work.

An honorable mention goes out to DFC Jeff Chase who consistently performs and has proven himself to be an outstanding officer. DFC Chase will receive something as well. Chase has also been consistently nominated for this award.

Outstanding job to all!


Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Hotel Robber Caught in the Act by SPD!

HOTEL ROBBER
SUSPECT ARRESTED BY SPD


Hotel armed robbery suspect was caught by SPD this morning just after robbing another hotel. Excellent work SPD!

Over the course of this week several hotels were robbed by a suspect in the Salisbury Area. Salisbury hotels were under surveillance by an on going investigation resulting in the arrest of the armed robbery suspect. No firearm was displayed, the suspect fled the scene and was arrested a short time there after. Over 20 police officers from multiple jurisdictions assisted in the arrest.

Primary credit to this arrest goes to SPD for an excellent job. All persons involved in this arrest did an outstanding job as cops. Something to be proud of.

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

American Military Power

East Side Deli Reward Fund

Hi Everyone,

I wanted to reach out to you all. I know many of you are aware of the tragic situation that took place in Salisbury, MD just over a week ago. For those of you who are not, here is what happened. My father was shot at our family Deli in Salisbury, MD on Monday, November 30th, by an armed robber. Those of you who know my father, know he is literally the kindest and most selfless person many people will ever meet. I'm sure many of you have heard the saying, "he would give you the shirt off his back"... well my father really would and then give you a bowl of his homemade soup too!

The man who robbed our Deli shot my father and then proceeded to steal money out of a cash register, while my father fought for his life and almost bled to death on the floor where he was shot. This individual cannot be allowed to commit another act of violence against anyone else!

**We are starting a reward fund for information leading to the arrest of the person responsible for this malicious act against my father. Anything you can donate to the reward fund would be greatly appreciated and may be the difference in catching this inhumane individual before he can hurt anyone else. If you can help please make any checks out to

"The Greg Knowles/ East Side Deli Reward Fund.

You can drop off checks at East Side Deli located at 1120 E. Main St., Salisbury, MD 21804 or mail them to the same address with Attention Alicia Knowles or Denise Knowles (my Mom).

If you would like to donate money that is fine too, we just need to keep a list of the amount of money you have donated and your phone number or Address incase the reward is not used. If the reward is not used then all money and checks will be returned to everyone.*Thank you all for your love and support. Please continue to pray for my Dad's speedy recovery, each day he improves a little more.

Much love to you all.

Should Chief Webster Resign?

By WicBury Crapper Board Member "HarleyCop2009"....

We've been pondering the question of if the Chief of the Salisbury City Police Department, Webster, should resign or not... Of course Joe Albero would like the Chief to resign and apparently so would the city's mayor. In an interview with the Chief and WBOC correspondent Elizabeth Harrington the Chief basically stated that he would resign only when he felt that it was appropriate and not before. The Chief is drawing more heat from the three armed robberies last night at the hotels across the Salisbury area.

The Holiday Inn, the Best Western and the Hampton Inn were hit just hours apart from each other. Apparently the same black male entered each of the hotels and presented a note demanding money.

So, this begs the question wouldn't something proactive been implemented prior to the third hotel being hit?

But, wouldn't the new chief, whomever that could be, inherit a sea of problems from budget issues, to personnel shortages, to an ever expanding wide crime problem? So we are left with questions, should the current Chief of Police Allan Webster resign and if so who should replace him? And what could a new chief do differently to combat the growing crime problem? What would you do differently?

WicBury Crapper Holiday Party Reminder

To All WicBury Crapper Board Members,

Reminder that the WicBury Crapper holiday party will be on December 19, 2009 at 1900 hours. Food and drink to be served. You and your spouse/significant other may attend. Thank you for RSVPing. Also, please bring your toys for tots donation for those of you have have not dropped them off yet to Crapper HQ.


  • Raffle for prizes to be held at 2030

  • Secret Santa

  • Open Bar

  • Catered By A Favorite Food Provider

2 Hotel Robberies

Two hotels in the Salisbury Area were robbed overnight... The Salisbury City Police Department responded to the Holiday Inn and to another hotel.

More to come...

Monday, December 14, 2009

Sup?


Sup?
Gotta match?

Comment from a reader by post and our response...

Crapper response in red..
Anonymous said...
All ten of you. LOL Your like the Tickle Me Elmo Crew.

December 14, 2009 12:31 PM

WRONG....We's a bad ass tickle me elmo crew.

Sunday, December 13, 2009

The MD. food bank is in need of your help

The MD. food bank is in need of your help

DECEMBER 21 ST IN FRONT OF DELMAR TOWN HALL

Just before the joint meeting at 7 pm please clean out your pantry & bring as many food items as you can !The MD food bank will be there to accept them.

I personally challenged all commissioners to bring a frozen Turkey or Ham to the meeting to donate .Lets show them what Delmar can do!!!

If you can't make it call 443-359-5049 and I will come pick up your donation and take it for you.

YOU COULD BE THE DIFFERENCE FOR A FAMILY/CHILD EATING THIS SEASON

TOM MCGUIRE PARTNERED WITH MD FOOD BANK

DIRECTORY
VONNE TERRY MD.
FOOD BANK
28500 Owens Branch Road Salisbury, MD 21801
(410) 742-0050
COME GET YOU CASINO UPDATE

Saturday, December 12, 2009

Comment from a reader by post and our response...

Crapper response in red...

Anonymous said...

I know for a fact that you do not post all the post sent in. If is about you or one of your buddies. So you are not better then the Brass.

Print that


The WicBury Crapper said...

To 4:07:
You are correct. Wow we printed it. Now what? Does your penis feel bigger? Did your testicles turn to brass or what? Who is "you" or "one of your buddies"? There's ten of us. We have a lot of "buddies".
May we recommend a basic ESOL class? Geeze.

We do not print probably about half the comments that are sent in to us. That's what the article was about?

Further, we don't print any comments that indicate anyone as a possible board member. If you said the Chief of Salisbury PD was on the board, we wouldn't print that either. We also don't print any comments that name individuals.

The major difference between us and "brass" is that we do this for nothen and give away prizes to good cops for nothen. You get paid to deal with brass and brass gets paid more to deal with you (we can see why).We never claimed to be better than Brass.

In fact, Brass in some departments have been doing much better than before and we commend them on their changes. We don't claim to be better than anyone else at all, except for maybe criminals. But, in general we are just here to share opinion. If you don't like someone who you assume is on our board or don't like a person in your department hey, tough shit. That's life, don't read the blog, kiss our asses, and don't talk to the person, ya rocket scientist. We could care less.
For those of you that read us and like us, great, thanks for reading!
We print what we want. If we don't like what you have to say, we just won't print it.

Depression in Law Enforcement?


By WicBury Crapper Board Member "CornLogsRule"...


It is no secret that over 1/4 of police officers are taking some type of anti-depressant or have taken some type of anti depressant in the past. In fact, the person who seems very out going or happy-go-lucky may in fact be dosing themselves four times a day.
There are several factors for this issue... mostly stress related.


  • Roting Shifts - Rotating shifts can cause a major instability in brain chemicals such as serotonin. Serotonin as been highly linked with "thinking straight" and depression. A lack of serotonin can cause serious problems.

  • PTSD - Although we all are "macho" guys and gals, we do see a lot of stuff that happens daily. A lot of this negative observation is absorbed or laughed off.

  • Reassignment/Demotion/Administrative Action - Can cause major depression in many police officers.

  • Increased Workload - A high stress workload, day after day after day, can frustrate people that get upset when they are up to their ears in paperwork which doesn't seem to get any better.

  • Advancement/Toys for others - When officers see specific officers get toys, goodies, and Bennie's, again and again and again but they are working just as hard, can breed depression.

  • Backstabbing - A high level of anxiety can be linked to co-worker crap talking. What's funny is the people that talk the most crap, feel the worst about themselves as a person and are much more prone to depression and suicide. Some people are threatened by people who produce more, are younger, or are suck ups.

  • SAD - Seasonal Affective Disorder can effect a multitude of people. When it is gray and rainy out day after day, people tend to feel sad. Many times, a lack of vitamin "D", which is absorbed through sunlight, is the culprit. Tanning helps elevate this issue sometimes.

Additionally, some people suffer from forms of paranoia. Paranoia isn't just thinking that people are out to kill you like zombies wondering around. Lower forms of paranoia manifest themselves as thinking that people are constantly talking about them negatively or plotting against them constantly. Many people that suffer from this lower form of paranoia also suffer from social anxiety disorder where they feel very uncomfortable in social settings with people.

These really aren't symptoms of a true mental illness however they typically do indicate a brain chemical imbalance, typically a lack of serotonin which is an important neurotransmitter that "greases" the brain wheels. Many people take a neuro reuptake inhibitor like Zoloft or other. This acts on the neurons of the brain and prevents them from sucking up too much of the serotonin, making more available in the brain, and thus improving the well being of the patient.

Some people suffering from these symtoms can't see the forest through the trees, meaning they can't rationally observe that people are in fact not out to do them in. Some people can not escape the box without balancing their serotonin levels.

Officer of the Month Nov. 2009 Current Poll Results - FOUR VOTING DAYS LEFT!

Our voting system for officer of the month November, 2009 is now up and running!

Cast your vote for who you think should win the Officer of the Month award for November. New prizes include gift cards, dinners, electronics, music, and more! Now with more secure electronic voting procedures in place.

Take the Poll







Polling ends on 12/16/09.



Current Polling Results - Updated 12/12/09 at 1700 hrs.

Current candidates:

  1. Entire SET Unit SPD - Sgt Howard, Whitman, Underwood, Wilson, Devoe, Crockett, Larkin
  2. Shift E - WCSO

  3. DFC Jeff Chase (WCSO)

  4. Det Bob Wilson (WCSO)

  5. DFC Plant/Kirkpatrick (WCSO)

  6. Pfc Dallam (Delmar PD)

  7. Dep. Jeff Heath (WCSO)

Listening to your brain: 5 ways to deal with job stress

12/11/2009

Passion for the Job
with Joel F. Shults, Ed.D.

The problem with talking to cops about stress is that there’s a little too much touchy-feely going on in some of those discussions. So let’s talk biology. Our brain soup is not a hot tub with little bubbles of hearts and balloons percolating around just waiting to be nurtured. It’s a complicated but primitive mess of chemistry and tissue. Much of what we interpret and label as “feelings” are actually biological processes over which we may have limited control.

No tough cop wants to think they have lost control of their feelings. I sure don’t want to think that. My job and identity are defined by self-control. I need it, I like it, I’m proud of it, and I’m not giving it up. But if I break a leg and it hurts and makes me limp, that has nothing to do with self-control. It’s just a limitation of biology caused by the stress of somebody’s bumper hitting me at 35 m.p.h. (been there, done that!). The same is true with my brain being thumped by stress. I can deal with it now, or limp with it later.

Basically your brain is operating in two different worlds: the rational and the primitive. When it comes to stress there’s a part of your brain that is sneaking around like a naughty teenager. Nestled comfortably somewhere behind your forehead is your parent-brain sitting in the den placidly smoking a pipe and reading Plato. The brain in the back of your skull is the teenager down in the basement bedroom doing God knows what. Like any parent of a teenager, the calm, rational brain relaxing in the den and analyzing life with a cool, experienced hand doesn’t necessarily want to know what’s going on in the basement. Like any teenager, the primitive basement brain doesn’t think the rational brain needs to know all of its business, but still needs attention and sometimes acts up just to see of the parent gives a darn.
So congratulations on that teen brain of yours. There it sits, nestled in the brain stem, probably thinking about sex. Even if you’re an old duffer like me that impulsive, adrenaline-fueled, hormone-charged bundle of nerves still wants to run things and doesn’t know when to shut up and behave.

Chances are good that your goofy youngster is doing what it thinks is best to help us survive, but making us miserable in the process. Basement brain is selfishly worried about surviving right this moment; it has no sense of the future. It doesn’t care about digestion or fighting off disease or starting a family. It only cares about keeping nerves at attention to recognize threats and getting blood to large muscle groups to be ready to fight. Teen brain doesn’t realize that putting the body in a state of hyper-alertness damages the parent’s ability to relax, engage in emotional closeness, sleep well, digest food, have fulfilling sex, or concentrate on small details. The parent brain is too busy compensating for these icky feelings to pay attention to the stuff in the basement even though that’s really where the problem is.

Are you getting the analogy? Is it time for you to get in touch with your inner 14-year-old. This is the person who is stressing you out and you don’t even know it. Consider one or more of these suggestions:

1) Ask the people who know you best “Do you think police work has changed me?” Don’t be defensive. Listen and let them answer honestly. Ask at least three people and compare their answers. Your self-awareness will impress them.

2) Be a watcher and listener. Cut the bravado and big talk. If there’s a tough case a fellow officer just handled you don’t have to get your puppy dog face on and say, “How did that make you feel?” Just listen. What you hear may tell you as much about yourself as it does about the other person.

3) Ask a younger version of yourself if you’re sadder, more tired, or less connected than you used to be. Think about who you were a few years ago. We all toughen up — that’s a good thing. But when we grew our thick skin did we trap a cold heart in there too?

4) Casually ask your doctor about stress — both traumatic and cumulative — and see where you are on the checklist of warning signs.

5) If you can’t manage to ask a professional then use the Internet or the public library to find some good information about PTSD, stress, and healthy lifestyles.

Joel Shults currently serves as Chief of Police for Adams State College in Alamosa, Co. Over his 30 year career in uniformed law enforcement and in criminal justice education Joel has served in a variety of roles: academy instructor, police chaplain, deputy coroner, investigator, community relations officer, college professor, and police chief, among others. Shults earned his doctorate in Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis from the University of Missouri, with a graduate degree in Public Services Administration and bachelors in Criminal Justice Administration from the University of Central Missouri. In addition to service with the US Army military police and CID, Shults has done observational studies with over fifty police agencies across the country. He currently serves on a number of advisory and advocacy boards including the Colorado POST curriculum committee as a subject matter expert.

Shotguns Anyone?

Now that shotguns may be authorized for some departments (we commend you on your decision to authorize these) we are including a series on tactical shotgun theory and practice. Bear in mind, this is for informational purposes only. Please consult your departmental training and firearms instructor for the proper use of your tactical shotgun.


Friday, December 11, 2009

Salisbury Crime Statistics

Here is the Crime Alert you've requested for today, December 11, 2009, which includes crime data for yesterday:

Breaking & Entering-5
Theft-11
Assault - 8

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

To talk smack or not to talk smack, that is the question...

From WicBury Crapper Board Member "ThinBlueLog"...

Well when we started the WicBury Crapper we figured that it's a blog so people should be allowed to say whatever they felt like, mainly because we believe in straightforward comment. But, shortly people started making negative comments about other people to include peons and administrators. So much so that it really bothered some people that other people were talking smack about them. Therefore, we started to filter some of the comments, or at least try to filter, that were plainly negative, demeaning, insulting, or just plain crazy. This resulted in a substantially loss to comments because a lot of people only want to talk smack about people from behind a computer instead of to their faces which is unfortunate.

Then we got comments and e-mails that people were disappointed that we were attempting to filter comments that were negative about people, so we decided to allow posts that didn't include names of personnel, figuring hey at least people can share their opinions without publicly insulting others.
This hasn't worked either because people really do want to talk smack about each other for some crazy reason.
So, we are left with a question for our readership... what type of comments do you think we should allow and why? Negative comments about anything? Negative comments not stating peoples names, just opinion? Or no negative comments at all? Of course, the knee jerk reaction is no negative comments but, really people want to talk smack..? Let us know what you think...

Wicomico County FOP

The WicBury Crapper said...

Also we would like to thank the Wicomico County FOP for their continued support and fight for LEOPS.

So, we would like to personally thank the FOP board of directors for their continued support and dedicated efforts on behalf of all of the Law Enforcement Officers in Wicomico County. Thank you. Your efforts have not been overlooked by some.

The WicBury Crapper is does not have any affiliation with the Wicomico County FOP.

Comment from a reader...about Crapper haters..

Crapper responses in red

Anonymous said...

Hey guys. Thanks for this site. I JUST WANT TO SAY YOU GUYS ARE GREAT AT NEVER PARAPHRAISING A COMMENT. THERE'S NO DOUBT THAT TEN OF YOU KNOWLEGABLE PEOPLE RUN THIS SITE.

JOE ALBEROS GOT NOTHING ON YOU ALL.ILL CONTINUE TO FAITHFULLY COMMENT DAILY. YOU GUYS ARE AT THE TIP TOP OF YOUR GAME COPS. ANYONE WHO DOESN'T LIKE YOU SHOULD KISS YOUR ASSES! Viva la crapper!

Why thank you reader. It's readers like you that make getting up in the morning all that more special. You make us feel all warm and fuzzy inside. Like we've always said, if you don't like us, don't read us. It's perplexing to us why someone would read something that they don't like? It's like eating a liverwurst sandwich if you don't like liverwurst. It's not like we are cramming our hot tub steak down your throats?

So, crapper haters, if you don't like us, try sticking your heads up your asses and jumping up and down until you disappear? Sorry, donno we heard that somewhere from some retarded window licker somewhere. Thought it was kinda funny but, doesn't make much sense. Really, we find the negative comments pretty hilarious most of the time. Anyways, happy reading "Crapaholics"!

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Comment from a reader by post and our response...

Crapper Response in Red

In response to http://wicburycrapper2.blogspot.com/2009/12/comment-from-reader.html

Anonymous said... Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Comment from a reader...": So 10:15 he starts rumors about God or do you see yourself as a God. Maybe that is part of your problem. Being that anon 10:15 is a Crapper Board member. I think maybe they should refrain from printing his post or print all the repsonses to his post.

This is why your site is going in the shitter.

December 8, 2009 12:55 PM

Wow, that's nice. People. People can we take the knives out of each others backs for a minute? We can't understand who is taking about whom frankly nor do we really care. We can say for a def. conclusion that whomever 10:15 is, he is not a board member. We know this because we know when board members post internally.

As far as this blog going down the shitter... hey at least you're reading it. The blog is called The WicBury Crapper! We've always known we were crap. Who else has done anything, anything for cops in this area but the WicBury Crapper and possibly you're FOP (not that we are aligned with the FOP in any form). We don't see anyone else out here posting good articles about fellow cops or giving out awards? So, like we've always said, if you don't like our crap don't read us. We don't care either way. To put some wondering at rest we will tell you how many people are where. Currently the WicBury Crapper Board is composed of the following:

  • 5 at WCSO
  • 1 Delmar PD
  • 1 Fruitland PD
  • 1 MSP
  • 2 Salisbury PD
    2 Ranking Contributors
    3 Ranking Board Members

Although people constantly try to pin who "The Crapper" is on someone, it's not just one person although one person is "Das Crapper". Actually, many people would be very surprised as to who board members actually are in our estimation. It is not whom you may expect, as we have expressed this on here before. Only Das Crapper knows who the Crapper contributors are.

Frankly it's amazing that an organization such as us can have ten people in it from law enforcement across multiple agencies who keep their mouths shut. But this is because of the Crapper Inter Sactum. Although we are not going to give away our secrets of this organization or it's board operations we can say we are proud that to date no one knows who the crapper members or Das Crapper really are.


And, the Crapper is alive and well and we do have an extended readership. Although we may not get as many comments as some other blogs it's more or less because we are directly a law enforcement oriented website and people have expressed concern that their identity may be discoverable. However, this would be very, very rare and only in exceptional conditions requiring legal intervention.

Nevertheless we appreciate you continued support here at the Crapper.

Sunday, December 6, 2009

How do I keep my kids safe online and teach them positive values?


We found a website we would like to share with everyone called ikeepsafe.org. This is an awsome website that educates kids and adults on how to be safe in their online community.

It also includes it's own own online community and kids chat area called "Woogie World" that trains kids on how to be safe online, positive social and life skills, and balancing online time with off-line family time. It allows them to "roam" around the woogie city online, chat with other woogie's (safely), and have their own woogie bank accounts and buy woogie stuff for their woogie pads. It's chat room is "safe" and prior to kids using it they must undergo online training. It's really a pretty cool website you should check out today for you and your kids.
All free.

Joe Albero Show...Joe Albero qualifies as having a mental disorder...

From WicBury Crapper Boardmember "CornLogsRule" and "ThinBlueLog"...

We are not sure why Rob Mulford, the owner of Market Street Bar and Grill, would go on the "Joe Albero Show". Rob's daughter has cancer and we very much respect the idea of Rob going to every outlet he can in order to raise awareness of this issue and cancer in kids. But Joe is an idiot.

The Albero show, in our view, is nothing but an self ego serving display to Joe Albero. Joe has had an impressive blogging career which he has recently parlayed into a new public access television show. Most of Joes shows and guests are rants about his battle with the city police chief and the city of Salisbury, which he undertook several years ago when his wife was dismissed from the Salisbury Zoo. In fact, Joe has been such a royal pain in the ass to Salisbury that the then Major Tilghman did not run for another term, the zoo director Jim Rapp left his job, and the current city police Chief undergoes a constant barrage of Joe's character aspersions. While we very much respect Rob's dedication to the effort for getting the word out on his daughter any appearance on Joe's "Show" just further Joe's ego of now thinking he is a talkshow host. If this was the case, WBOC would have employed him a long time ago when he went to them begging for a slot on their news program.

Joe, your show is self serving. We are surprised that he can talk with one hand down his pants. Some people just love to hear themselves talk. It's self love, a basic principle of a classic Narcissistic Personality Disorder. The camera work is shoddy and the audio is horrible. Think about replacing the terminator, fake Oakley sunglasses also, its cloudy out Joe. You aren't cool.

Lets check with our friends at Google Health, what is wrong with Joe Albero?

While you are at it, check if you fit these categories. Now the affliction is called Narcissistic Personality Disorder but in the past it used to be called, "Hey, Asshole.."

Overview - https://health.google.com/health/ref/Narcissistic+personality+disorder


Narcissistic personality disorder is a condition in which there is an inflated sense of self-importance and an extreme preoccupation with one's self.

Symptoms

A person with narcissistic personality disorder:

  1. Reacts to criticism with rage, shame, or humiliation
  2. Takes advantage of other people to achieve his or her own goals
  3. Has feelings of self-importance
  4. Exaggerates achievements and talents
  5. Is preoccupied with fantasies of success, power, beauty, intelligence, or ideal love
  6. Has unreasonable expectations of favorable treatment
  7. Requires constant attention and admiration
  8. Disregards the feelings of others, lacks empathy
  9. Has obsessive self-interest
  10. Pursues mainly selfish goals

Well we think that Joe checks off on each of these categories (we are not making these up, these are real assessments for this disorder). Further, if you think you, our reader, do not fit these categories, as a friend or co worker, you may be an asshole in need of mental help like Joe here.

If you do fit into these categories fortunately there is a cure called STFU. STFU is available over the counter or in knuckle to nose form (knuckle to eye and teefs form is also available upon request). There is also the new STFU-B available for female persons with this widespread disorder.

Who else do you suspect to have crippling personality disorder?

"Tom" Anonymous Visitor to Pingbox's Question....

The PingBox is a yahoo utility that shows on the right hand side of the blog where you can ask questions live to WicBury Crapper Board Members.... Our response in RED.

Tom is an anonymous visitor to Pingbox.

I had a thought concerning crime in Wicomico. Would it be possible to deputize 1000 volunteer citizens to carry concealed weapons. These would be persons who would pay for and pass a background check, people who would pay for their own training in firearms and who would buy their own approved weapon. Imagine if the thugs knew that there were 1000 armed plainclothes deputies on the streets?

An interesting suggestion but, we don't think this would ever happen for several reasons. A deputy also has arrest powers and all the powers of a police officer so for those reasons we doubt the Sheriff would deputize 1000 people to have arrest powers and carry weapons in plaincloths. Although a deterrent, we shutter to think what 1000 people with no police training, carrying firearms and authorized to use them during enforcement of the law, would result in. You're resulting situation would probably be shootouts in the streets between armed "deputies" with little training and suspected thugs. Lastly a deputy's "power" is derived from the Sheriff so in essence the deputy is an extension of the Sheriff's power. The Sheriff, being the most powerful law enforcement body in the county, puts full faith in his deputies to carry out enforcement of the law in his stead. In order for law enforcement officers to maintain their powers in Maryland they must pass a course of credit hours (6 months) at an accredited police academy, must attend in service training every year, and must be field trained, among other stringent background qualifications. This is why a lot of people don't every become police officers... Although some "slip through the cracks" it's not many. Less than 1/2 of 1% of 500,000 police officers in the United States is ever charged with a crime while sworn. Although the Sheriff can deputize citizens in cases of emergency, again due to liability reasons we feel this situation would probably never happen as the "Reserve Deputy" program is no longer taking place either, to our knowledge anyway.

Friday, December 4, 2009

Article By WicBury Crapper Board Member "SilentButDeadly"...

Security Tips

As many of us know we have been previously tasked with conducting patrol checks at local establishments at a time of increasing armed robberies. There are somethings you as a police officer and as a citizen should do to exercise caution while walking through any open parking lot, entering a convenience store, or conducting a patrol check of an establishment.

For the Police...
  • While conducting patrol checks realize that 99% of these checks, due to your random nature of patrol, you will not encounter an issue. However 1% of the time may be deadly. Do not become complacent.
  • No matter what time of day it is never park directly in front of an establishment. If conducting a drive through check, drive through at a distance of more than 25 yards if possible and observe the front of the store and vehicles in the lot. Anyone in the store wearing a mask is a good indication that they are robbing the place.
  • The majority of robbers are armed.
  • If a firearm is pointed at you or you are in fear for your life do not hesitate to shoot. Watch your background.
  • While approaching the front of the store, note positions of stanchions out front and good defensible locations.
  • Remember cover and concealment are not the same thing.
  • Call out with your patrol checks to dispatch, every time. In the event you surprise a suspect use your emergency button while engaging the target.
  • The pillars in police cars have been known to deflect bullets. Better defensible position is behind the engine block.
  • If you are being shot at, shoot to kill.
  • If you are dying, take the suspect with you with your last breaths. Even shot in the heart you still have a good five seconds to engage your target.
  • Always, ALWAYS carry your firearm off duty with an extra magazine.

For citizens...

  • Be aware of your surroundings. People following you through a parking lot is not good. Check for escape routes between vehicles.
  • While walking through a parking lot watch for people emerging between vehicles. Watch their hands.
  • Park as close as possible to the entrance.
  • If using an ATM, scan the bank first. Circle around once or twice to check to see if anyone is hiding around the corner. If using walk in banking watch the outside of the bank several minutes to determine if it is being robbed first. Are customers walking out after they walk in?
  • Do not carry large amounts of cash.
  • Walk with a purpose and game face. When you walk into or out of a large store parking lot area put your "game face on". Don't be distracted talking on the phone. Look around and have an attentive appearance. Walk with a purpose and direction instead of meandering around slowly. If someone approaches look at their waist to see if they are carrying a weapon or obtaining a weapon from their waistband area.
  • Your vehicle is a 2000 lbs weapon. In in a life threatening situation such as an armed car jacking and you have a route of escape through a suspect. Don't hesitate to run him over and kill him. He's not being nice to you, don't be nice to him, it may cost you your life.
  • Defensive mace sprays can be ineffective especially against someone armed with a handgun. If kidnapped an edged weapon (knife) can be much more effective if utilized correctly such as a stab wound to the jugular or directly to the heart through the ribcage. The goal is to cause death to your kidnapper.

Public Notice By The WicBury Crapper Board of Directors


Ladies and Gentlemen in Law Enforcement and To the General Public...

We have a very serious crime problem in progress. Yet another armed robbery has resulted in the shooting of a store clerk at the East Side Deli. This article is an attempt to save officers lifes and citizens lives.


Exceptional Issues


  • Until recently the City Police Chief did not request additional assistance from outside agencies and is embroiled in a spat with the Mayor, Jim Ireton, over three reprimands that he received regarding a "video tape" of Debbie Cambell (city council person) that occurred prior to his installment as the Chief of Police.

  • Our County Executive Rick wants to make additional departmental budget cuts in order to keep from dipping into the reserve funds the county has at a direct cost to our safety.

  • Shift staffing at both county and city agencies continues to be exceptionally low. Sometimes there are only four officers working per shift for each the county or city departments.

  • Personnel still continue to lack the basic tools required for effective law enforcement to include rifles, shotguns and taser weapons. These tools are readily available due to the fact that many officers own private Remmington 870 shotguns (typical standard for law enforcement) and can be put into service immediately. Most officers have already been qualified previously.

  • Officers in the past have been ordered to conduct "patrol checks" in the wake of robbery increases. This is a serious tactical safety issue instead of a deterrent. Police administrators we are directing this statement directly to you. You are asking officers to engage in a serious lack of tactical safety. Just like alarm calls 99.9% of the time officers will ride to the patrol check not expecting something to happen and more then likely drive directly through the front parking lot or park in front of the store entering. Many of the armed robberies have been with shotguns. Eventually, you are prompting a unexpected confrontation between the officer and the suspect whereas the suspect has the tactical advantage over the officer conducting their patrol check. Eventually, an officer (one) conducting a patrol check will run right into an armed suspect. A shootout will occur and an officer may loose their life in the line of duty. At this point departments will "review" their policies and make shotguns available. This practice will cause an officer their life. While it is an essential job function of officers to protect the public from criminals bear in mind that you must conduct yourself with the utmost tactical safety in mind. It is clear that the criminals are ready to engage in deadly confrontations with the public so it is clear to assume that they will not hesitate at killing a police officer.

  • Although some administrators have made it clear to render assistance when required typically in the past rendering assistance has unofficially been highly discouraged, even reprimanded. Do not believe everything you read.

Requires Immediate and Exceptional Solutions

  • It should be relatively clear by now where people's political priorities lay. Clearly both Jim Ireton and Chief Webster, while engaging in on going pissing contests, including law suit by Webster against blogger Joe Albero, are not engaging in effective policing strategies. While Webster makes it a point stating that they need more officers, everyone needs more officers. Both of these politicians must be removed. We must elect a mayor that is not afraid to take action and terminate the police chief. This type of pissing contest can not be allowed to continue and is indicative of our overall government (both local, state and federal) failure to effectively lead.

  • We do not endorse the reelection of Jim Ireton or Rick Pollitt. Both these people are ineffective. We support the termination of Chief Webster.

  • Do not sentence officers to death by sending them to patrol checks of establishments without stressing the importance of tactical safety or giving them the tools required to maintain their safety and the safety of the citizens. All officers need shotguns, rifles, and tasers immediately. This lack of priority in this area is completely a failure of government leaders. You want personnel to risk their lives for less money without the proper tools required to defend themselves. An officer will die in a shooting situation if not mentally prepared and have to tools to combat the criminals because of a direct failure of departmental leaders to institute basic safety tools to the field troops.

  • Departmental leaders, do not be afraid of liability or press. People cry when there is a crime problem and the media crys when criminals are "mishandled" by the police. It's the name of the game. Sheriff Mike Lewis has done an excellent job of publicly defending some of his troops. Strong articles should be written or PSA's done about criminal enforcement across the county.
  • A Mutijuristicational jump or zero squad must be enacted immediately.

  • Police administrators in some departments are an untapped patrol resource. All police administrators should immediately take up patrol positions several days per week to augment their staff shortages. These administrators should answer calls for service and work as temporally reassigned "PFC's" without rank several days a week.
  • "Deputize" former retired volunteer law enforcement officers to augment patrol deficiencies.