Notice...

Please be advised: The WicBury Crapper and it’s staff take no responsibility for metering, publishing, filtering, or maintaining comments from our readers. Although we do our best screen most comments, some harassing, ignorant, or offensive comments may be posted by our readers.All comments are the sole responsibility of their respective commenters. By reading this blog you expressly consent to not being offended by the information contained herein and agree not to take legal action for any information contained herein against any member of the WicBury Crapper or it's staff or board. If this blog or any of it's content offends you, please leave now.

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

ANOTHER HYPOTHETICAL

You are the only officer walking down Church Street. You turn a corner and see what you believe is a drug deal, specifically a person hand an item you can't see to another and who receives a $20 bill in exchange. Immediately you order them up against the wall and start to conduct a search of both. One turns his head, but is forced back to the wall. He then turns the other way and bolts down the street. The officer calls backup, but no one is available. He tells the one who stays against the wall to stay there, and the officer chases down the one who bolted, placing him in handcuffs and drags him back. Amazingly, upon returning to the location where it started, the one who was ordered to stay at that location is still there, and even more amazingly, upon searching him, suspected crack cocaine is found. A $20 bill is located on the one who was chased down. Are the searches legal? With what offenses could each defendant be charged?

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

The searches are leagal anywhere except Wicomico County. We have the best Judges!

Anonymous said...

I would charge the one that ran with failing to maintain adequate speed.

The one who remained as ordered would not be charged as he is too stupid to understand what he did wrong.

Anonymous said...

well, according to a certain District Court Judge (R.S.D.), the detainment would be illegal and would highly suggest that the "victim's" (suspect's) seek legal counsel to sue the cops Federally.

Anonymous said...

I wish it turned out that way for Rusty, his stayed and then ended up medically retiring over it.