All of the answers submitted were good ones. The outcome hinges on whether the failure to advise the defendant of Miranda warnings was inadvertent. In the hypothetical, the Detective was simply distracted and forgot to advise the defendant of Miranda Warnings. This does not, of necessity, affect the voluntariness of the confession, assuming none of the other factors (threats, etc.) were present. The best answer is that the portion of the statement given pre-Miranda should and would be suppressed as a "mere violation" of Miranda. That portion of the statement might still be admissible should the defendant take the stand and testify to contrary facts.
The portion of the statement taken after the Detective advised the defendant of Miranda would be admissible in view of Oregon v. Elstad and several Maryland cases, State v. Jackson and others following suit. Keep in mind, however, that the state courts have the option of deciding voluntariness under either state constitutional or state common law as opposed to Federal Constitutional grounds. Some of the highest state courts decide cases based on state constitutional law if they do not like recent Supreme Court holdings. Therefore the answer may be different in the other states which would do their own analysis of the law of that state.
All in all, under the circumstances, this is a win for the Good Guys. However, I will add the following warning: A deliberate decision to elicit a confession without Miranda followed by advice of rights in order to secure a "full blown" legitimate confession will not work. Maryland cases have considered what used to be a routine practice by some law enforcement agencies in obtaining confessions in this manner, and the Courts have held that a confession elicited under those circumstances will not be admissible.
Other states may use the information obtained in Maryland to further their investigations.
The Defendant's so-called luck has run out. Off to the Maryland Penitentiary he goes.
ATTENTION ALL SBYNEWS VIEWERS
-
The new SBYNews Website is now up and running. Everyone will need to type
in sbynews.com and save it as one of your favorites. Many of you are
logging in u...
4 years ago
2 comments:
excellent. these are really helping me understand how to be a better cop.
I like reading these too. It makes you think about what you are doing while working in order to prepare a good end case. Thanks Counsel. Who knew that a crapper could have it's own lawyer? Still keep up the great work guys.
Post a Comment